The  NYPD monitors everyone in the city who changes his or her name,  according to internal police documents and interviews. For those whose  names sound Arabic or might be from Muslim countries, police run  comprehensive background checks  that include reviewing travel records, criminal histories, business  licenses and immigration documents. All this is recorded in police  databases for supervisors, who review the names and select a handful of  people for police to visit.
The  program was conceived as a tripwire for police in the difficult hunt for  homegrown terrorists, where there are no widely agreed upon warning  signs. Like other NYPD intelligence programs created in the past decade,  this one involved monitoring behavior protected by the First Amendment.
Since  August, an Associated Press investigation has revealed a vast NYPD  intelligence-collecting effort targeting Muslims following the terror  attacks of September 2001. Police have conducted surveillance of entire  Muslim neighborhoods, chronicling every aspect of daily life, including  where people eat, pray and get their hair cut. Police infiltrated dozens  of mosques and Muslim student groups and investigated hundreds more.
Monitoring  name changes illustrates how the threat of terrorism now casts  suspicion over what historically has been part of America's story. For  centuries, immigrants have Americanized their names in New York. The  Roosevelts were once the van Rosenvelts. Fashion designer Ralph Lauren was born Ralph Lifshitz. Donald Trump's grandfather changed the family name from Drumpf.
David  Cohen, the NYPD's intelligence chief, worried that would-be terrorists  could use their new names to lie low in New York, current and former  officials recalled. Reviewing name changes was intended to identify  people who either Americanized their names or took Arabic names for the  first time, said the officials, who insisted on anonymity because they  were not authorized to discuss the program.
NYPD spokesman Paul  Browne did not respond to messages left over two days asking about the  legal justification for the program and whether it had identified any  terrorists.The goal was to find a way to spot terrorists like Daood Gilani and Carlos Bledsoe before they attacked.
Gilani,  a Chicago man, changed his name to the unremarkable David Coleman  Headley to avoid suspicion as he helped plan the 2008 terrorist shooting  spree in Mumbai, India. Bledsoe, of Tennessee, changed his name to Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad in 2007 and, two years later, killed one soldier and wounded another in a shooting at a recruiting station in Little Rock, Ark.
Sometime  around 2008, state court officials began sending the NYPD information  about new name changes, said Ron Younkins, the court's chief of  operations. The court regularly sends updates to police, he said. The  information is all public, and he said the court was not aware of how  police used it.The NYPD program  began as a purely analytical exercise, according to documents and  interviews. Police reviewed the names received from the court and  selected some for background checks that included city, state and  federal criminal databases as well as federal immigration and Treasury  Department databases that identified foreign travel.
Early  on, police added people with American names to the list so that if  details of the program ever leaked out, the department would not be  accused of profiling, according to one person briefed on the program.
On  one police document from that period, 2 out of every 3 people who were  investigated had changed their names to or from something that could be  read as Arabic-sounding.
All the  names that were investigated, even those whose background checks came  up empty, were cataloged so police could refer to them in the future.
The  legal justification for the program is unclear from the documents  obtained by the AP. Because of its history of spying on anti-war  protesters and political activists, the NYPD has long been required to  follow a federal court order when gathering intelligence. That order  allows the department to conduct background checks only when police have  information about possible criminal activity, and only as part of  "prompt and extremely limited" checking of leads.The NYPD's rules also prohibit opening investigations based solely on activities protected by the First Amendment. Federal courts have held that people have a right to change their names and, in the case of religious conversion, that right is protected by the First Amendment.
The NYPD is not alone in its monitoring of Muslim neighborhoods. The FBI has its own ethnic mapping program that singled out Muslim communities and agents have been criticized for targeting mosques.
The  name change program is an example of how, while the NYPD says it  operates under the same rules as the FBI, police have at times gone  beyond what is allowed by the federal government. The FBI would not be  allowed to run a similar program because of First Amendment and privacy  concerns and because the goal is too vague and the program too broad,  according to FBI rules and interviews with federal officials.
Police  expanded their efforts in late 2009, according to documents and  interviews. After analysts ran background checks, police began selecting  a handful of people to visit and interview.
Internally,  some police groused about the program. Many people who were approached  didn't want to talk and police couldn't force them to.
A  Pakistani cab driver, for instance, told police he did not want to talk  to them about why he took Sheikh as a new last name, documents show.
Police  also knew that a would-be terrorist who Americanized his name in hopes  of lying low was unlikely to confess as much to detectives. In fact, of  those who agreed to talk at all, many said they Americanized their names  because they were being harassed or were having problems getting a job  and thought a new name would help.
But as with other intelligence  programs at the NYPD, Cohen hoped it would send a message to would-be  bombers that police were watching, current and former officials said.As it expanded, the program began to target Muslims even more directly, drawing criticism from Stuart Parker, an in-house NYPD lawyer, who said there had to be standards for who was being interviewed, a person involved in the discussions recalled. In response, police interviewed people with Arabic-sounding names but only if their background checks matched specific criteria.
The  names of those who were interviewed, even those who chose not to speak  with police, were recorded in police reports stored in the department's  database, according to documents and interviews, while names of those  who received only background checks were kept in a separate file in the  Intelligence Division.
Donna  Gabaccia, director of the Immigration History Research Center at the  University of Minnesota, said that for many families, name changes are  important aspects of the American story. Despite the myth that officials  at Ellis Island Americanized the names of people arriving in the U.S.,  most immigrants changed their names themselves to avoid ridicule and  discrimination or just to fit in, she said.
The NYPD program, she said, turned that story on its head.
"In  the past, you changed your name in response to stigmatization," she  said. "And now, you change your name and you are stigmatized. There's  just something very sad about this."
As for converts to Islam, the religion does not require them to take Arabic names but many(...)More.

 
 
 
 
 
 10/26/2011 03:37:00 AM
10/26/2011 03:37:00 AM
 live news
live news
 












0 commentaires:
Post a Comment