Pakistan is seen as critical to  bringing peace to neighboring Afghanistan, but the United States has  failed to persuade it to go after militant groups it says cross the border to attack Western forces in Afghanistan.
"This is not helping either the United States, Afghanistan or Pakistan," Salim Saifullah  told Reuters. "There will be pressure on the (Pakistan) government to  get out of this war," he said, referring to the U.S. war on militancy.
Obama warned Pakistan on Thursday  that its ties with "unsavory characters" had put relations with the  United States at risk, as he ratcheted up pressure on Islamabad to cut  links with militants mounting attacks in Afghanistan.
His comments are likely to deepen a crisis in the strategic alliance between the United States and Pakistan.Obama accused Pakistan's leaders of  "hedging their bets" on Afghanistan's future, but stopped short of  threatening to cut off U.S. aid, despite calls from lawmakers for a  tougher line over accusations that Pakistani intelligence supported  strikes on U.S. targets in Afghanistan.
Pakistan says it has sacrificed  more than any other nation that joined America's global "war on terror"  after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, losing 10,000  soldiers and security forces, and 30,000 civilians.
But its performance against  militants operating from its unruly tribal northwest border region is a  frequent source of tension between Washington and Islamabad.
Ties were heavily strained after  U.S. special forces launched a unilateral raid that killed Osama bin  Laden in a Pakistani town on May 2.
They deteriorated further after the  top U.S. military official accused Pakistan's Inter-Services  Intelligence (ISI) spy agency of supporting a September 13 attack by the  Taliban-allied Haqqani militant group on the U.S. embassy in Kabul.
Saifullah said Washington's public criticism of Pakistan was counter-productive and would only encourage militant groups.
"War in Afghanistan is passing  through a critical phase, evolutionary phase," he said. "At this stage,  muddying water is not appropriate. This is exactly what the militants  want. They are playing to their tune. This is adding strength to them."
Some analysts agree with his assessment."This will create more tension and what the Americans want is not likely to happen in the near future," said political analyst Hasan Askari Rizvi.
The United States has long called for a military offensive against the Haqqani network, which it says is based in North Waziristan, a global hub for militants on the Afghan border.
Pakistan sees the Haqqani network -- perhaps the most feared  Taliban-allied insurgents in Afghanistan -- as a counterweight to the  growing influence of rival India there, analysts say.Pakistan denies links to the group,  which says it no longer operates from sanctuaries in North Waziristan  and feels secure operating in Afghanistan after battlefield gains.
Obama made clear that future  U.S.-Pakistani relations would depend heavily on whether Islamabad  complies with Washington's demands to sever connections with insurgents.
But public demand from Washington  will make Islamabad more reluctant to take action because caving in  after constant pressure could be political suicide in a country where  anti-American sentiment runs high, and the government is unpopular.
Many Pakistanis believe they have been dragged into a war against militancy that only serves American interests.
That sentiment has become more  widespread because of an escalation of U.S. drone aircraft missile  strikes against militants in Pakistan under the Obama administration.
"Are we owned by the United States?  If so, please make our terms of servitude clear Mr. Obama so we can  just get on with it," said Mishayl Naek, a bank employee in the city of  Karachi, in reaction to...More.

 
 
 
 
 
 10/07/2011 02:32:00 AM
10/07/2011 02:32:00 AM
 live news
live news
 











0 commentaires:
Post a Comment