 A former Penn State graduate assistant cited by a grand jury report  as claiming he saw an ex-assistant football coach sexually abusing a  young boy in a campus locker room shower says in an email he made sure  the act was stopped and then went to police — contradicting what the  report says.
A former Penn State graduate assistant cited by a grand jury report  as claiming he saw an ex-assistant football coach sexually abusing a  young boy in a campus locker room shower says in an email he made sure  the act was stopped and then went to police — contradicting what the  report says.Mike McQueary's  comments, in an email made available to The Associated Press on  Tuesday, appeared to add more confusion to a scandal that has enveloped  the university and resulted in the firing of head coach Joe Paterno, the ousting of president Graham Spanier and charges of perjury against the athletic director and a senior vice president.
 McQueary,  now the football team's wide receivers coach, told a friend from Penn  State that he made sure the 2002 shower assault he witnessed was stopped  and went to the police about it. The friend made McQueary's email,  written Nov. 8, available to the AP on Tuesday on the condition he not  be identified.
McQueary,  now the football team's wide receivers coach, told a friend from Penn  State that he made sure the 2002 shower assault he witnessed was stopped  and went to the police about it. The friend made McQueary's email,  written Nov. 8, available to the AP on Tuesday on the condition he not  be identified.McQueary, who  has been placed on administrative leave and did not coach in Saturday's  17-14 loss to Nebraska, wrote: "I did stop it, not physically ... but  made sure it was stopped when I left that locker room ... I did have  discussions with police and with the official at the university in  charge of police .... no one can imagine my thoughts or wants to be in  my shoes for those 30-45 seconds ... trust me."
Added  McQueary: "Do with this what you want ... but I am getting hammered for  handling this the right way ... or what I thought at the time was right  ... I had to make tough impacting quick decisions."
According  to the grand jury report, McQueary testified he spoke to his father and  then to Paterno before speaking to athletic director Tim Curley and senior vice president Gary Schultz,  who oversaw campus police. Paterno has not been charged with any crime,  and state prosecutors have said he is not a target. Curley and Schultz  are accused of breaking the law by not going to police but maintain  their innocence.
McQueary's actions also have been scrutinized,  with some critics suggesting he didn't do enough after witnessing what  he said was the sexual abuse of a child. Emails to McQueary from the AP  were not immediately answered Tuesday.McQueary's remarks in the email to his friend came less than a day after former assistant coach Jerry Sandusky's  admission that he showered with and "horsed around" with boys stunned  legal observers. Sandusky's comments, they said, could be used by  prosecutors trying to convict him of child sex abuse charges.
Experts  in criminal law and crisis management questioned Sandusky's decision to  give a TV interview in which he said that there was no abuse and that  any activities in a campus shower with a boy were just horseplay, not  molestation."Mr. Sandusky goes  on worldwide television and admits he did everything the prosecution  claims he did, except for the ultimate act of rape or sodomy? If I were a  prosecutor, I'd be stunned," said Lynne Abraham, the former district  attorney of Philadelphia. "I was stunned, and then I was revolted."
Abraham,  who led a grand jury probe involving 63 accused priests from the  Philadelphia archdiocese, was retained this week to lead an internal  investigation of Sandusky's charity, The Second Mile, from which he's  accused of culling his victims.Sandusky  is charged with abusing eight boys over the span of 15 years. He told  NBC on Monday that he is not a pedophile but should not have showered  with boys.
"I could say that I have done some of those things. I  have horsed around with kids. I have showered after workouts. I have  hugged them, and I have touched their legs without intent of sexual  contact," Sandusky said Monday on NBC News' "Rock Center." ''I am  innocent of those charges."When NBC's Bob Costas asked him whether he was sexually attracted to underage boys, Sandusky replied: "Sexually attracted, no. I enjoy young people. I love to be around them. But, no, I'm not sexually attracted to young boys."
Sandusky apparently decided to talk to Costas by phone Monday at the last minute, with the blessing of his attorney, Joseph Amendola, who was in the studio.
What was especially astonishing about Sandusky's interview was when he stumbled over the question about whether he was sexually attracted to children, said crisis management expert Eric Dezenhall, who runs a Washington consulting firm.
"That may not be legal proof that he's guilty, but it is certainly not helpful, to struggle with the question," Dezenhall said.
The  state grand jury investigation that led to Sandusky's arrest followed a  trail that goes back at least 13 years, leading to questions from some  quarters about whether law enforcement moved too slowly.
The  grand jury report detailed a 1998 investigation by Penn State police,  begun after an 11-year-old boy's mother complained that Sandusky had  showered with her son in the football facilities. Then-District Attorney  Ray Gricar declined to file charges.
Another  missed opportunity came in 2002, the grand jury said, when  then-graduate assistant McQueary told Paterno that he had witnessed  Sandusky sodomizing a boy in the team's showers.
The case  apparently took on new urgency three years ago, when a woman complained  to officials at her local school district that Sandusky had sexually  assaulted her son. School district officials banned Sandusky from school  grounds and contacted police, leading to an investigation by state  police, the attorney general's office and a grand jury.Gov. Tom Corbett took the case on a referral from the Centre County district attorney, Michael Madeira, in early 2009 while he was serving as attorney general.
Maderia said he referred the report to state prosecutors because of an "indirect connection" to Sandusky's family, but he declined to specify his tie to the Sandusky family.
Corbett bristled Tuesday when asked whether it was fair for people to criticize the pace of the probe.
"People  that are saying that are ill-informed as to how investigations are  conducted, how witnesses are developed, how backup information,  corroborative information is developed, and they really don't know what  they're talking about," he told reporters.The attorney general's office declined to comment on the pace of the investigation.
The  Patriot-News of Harrisburg reported Monday that only one trooper was  assigned to the case after the state took it over in 2009. It wasn't  until Corbett became governor early this year that his former  investigations supervisor in the attorney general's office, Frank  Noonan, became state police commissioner and put seven more  investigators on it, the newspaper said.Noonan's  spokeswoman, Maria Finn, said Tuesday that manpower was increased in  the case this year, but she could not confirm the numbers reported by  the newspaper.
"The  investigation, at the time, was gaining momentum," Finn said. "There  were more leads. There were more things to do at that point. It's not  that the state police weren't doing anything and Noonan comes in and  changes things."
With the case  now drawing global media attention and potential civil litigants  watching from the sidelines, Sandusky went on the offensive in the NBC  interview.
Criminal defense  lawyer Mark Geragos, who represented O.J. Simpson and other celebrity  defendants, said he would "knock my client over the head with a  two-by-four before I would let them do it, but it cuts both ways."
"If prosecutors use it, it can end up being testimony without cross examination," he said.
He  called the Penn State case an unusual case that may call for unusual  tactics, given the "instantaneous uproar to convict the guy."
The  New York Times reported Tuesday night that Paterno transferred full  ownership of his house to his wife, Sue, for $1 in July. The couple had  previously held joint ownership of the house. Paterno's attorney Wick  Sollers told the paper in an e-mail that the transfer had nothing to(...)Read more.

 
 
 
 
 
 11/15/2011 10:30:00 PM
11/15/2011 10:30:00 PM
 live news
live news
 











0 commentaires:
Post a Comment