The plan by Sen. Pat Toomey,  R-Pa., who serves on the 12-member debt supercommittee, would raise  revenue by limiting the tax breaks enjoyed by people who itemize their  deductions, in exchange for lower overall tax rates  for families at every income level. Taxpayers who already take the  standard deduction instead of itemizing — about two-thirds of filers —  could see tax cuts. The one-third of taxpayers who itemize their deductions might find themselves paying more.
The  top income tax rate would fall from 35 percent to 28 percent, and the  bottom rate would drop from 10 percent to 8 percent. The rates in  between would be reduced as well.A  GOP congressional aide said the plan is designed to raise taxes on  households in the top two tax brackets. That would affect individuals  making more than $174,400 and married couples making more than $212,300.  Some Republicans say the plan offers a potential breakthrough in  deficit-reduction talks that have stalled over GOP opposition to tax  hikes and Democrats' objection to cuts in benefit programs without  significant revenue increases.
House  Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, spoke of it favorably, but his party's  majority leader, Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, has declined to endorse  it. Several GOP presidential hopefuls also have criticized if for  offering to increase taxes.
Democrats,  meanwhile, have panned the plan, saying it would cut taxes for the  wealthy, raise taxes on the middle class and generate less revenue than  advertised.
The supercommittee  has a Wednesday deadline to come up with a plan to reduce government  borrowing by at least $1.2 trillion over the next decade. If the panel  fails, $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts to domestic and military  programs would take effect in 2013.
Some  details of Toomey's plan remain in flux, in part because he is open to  changes to help forge an agreement, said the GOP aide, who spoke on  condition of anonymity to discuss private negotiations. The aide  confirmed that Toomey's plan is closely modeled after a proposal by  three experts at the National Bureau of Economic Research, a private  research organization perhaps best known for deciding when recessions  begin and end.
The three experts are Martin Feldstein, a Harvard  University professor who was President Ronald Regan's chief economic  adviser; Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible  Federal Budget; and Daniel Feenberg, a research associate at the bureau.Under their plan, the tax benefits from itemizing deductions and excluding employer-provided health insurance from taxable income would be limited to 2 percent of taxpayer's adjusted gross income.
That means if a taxpayer has an adjusted gross income of $50,000, deductions and exemptions could reduce his or her tax bill by a maximum of $1,000.
Taxpayers who face limits on their tax breaks  could opt to take the standard deduction instead. Currently, about  one-third of tax filers itemize their deductions. The rest claim the  standard deduction, which in 2011 is $5,800 for individuals and $11,600  for married couples filing jointly.
The  plan envisions millions of additional taxpayers switching to the  standard deduction, which would simplify their returns, MacGuineas said.
Policymakers  across the political spectrum agree the federal tax code is too  complicated, and most agree on a basic formula for simplifying it:  Reduce tax breaks and use the additional revenue to lower the overall  tax rates for everyone.
There  is little agreement, however, on which tax breaks to target. The most  generous provisions exempt employer-provided health insurance and  retirement benefits from taxable income. The top itemized deductions  include those for mortgage interest, charitable donations and state and  local taxes.
Toomey's plan  attempts to sidestep debates over which tax breaks to target and instead  proposes to limit taxpayers' overall ability to reduce their tax bills.
"This  is a far more practical way to start to scale back the influence and  costs of tax expenditures in the code by kind of glopping them together  and capping them," MacGuineas said. "You're not picking the winners and  losers."
Economist Douglas Holtz-Eakin said the proposal "strikes me as quite clever."
"Right  now we let people choose between the standard deduction and itemized  deductions," said Holtz-Eakin, a former director of the(...)Read more.

 
 
 
 
 
 11/17/2011 03:04:00 AM
11/17/2011 03:04:00 AM
 live news
live news
 












0 commentaires:
Post a Comment